Search This Blog

Popular Posts

How would you rate this article

Friday, April 23, 2010

Vegetarianism: The Zarathushti world view

The Zarathushti faith being a promoter of Science and Knowledge recognizes Man as the only being empowered with a "Mun"; (pronounced to rhyme with "bun") the ability to Reason. This exclusive gift of mental capability is balanced with an advisory to act like an honest Trustee of the Earth, its bounty and its other life forms.
Summarized in the Gathic dictum: 
That action is GOOD, the Most Enlightened; that results in Good outcomes for ALL;
The advisory is to avoid any or all activities that mistreat or hurt animals.
Zarathushtra preached respect for all forms of life and environment
Bahman, Mohor, Gosh, and Ram as well as, the whole month of Bahman  are days established in the Zoroastrian calendar to eat exclusively vegetarian meals.




Yasna 32-12:

"Welfare protection of animals, is enshrined in the original advisory “Geush Morendan”,

Slaughtering animals by painful, non-enlightened methods is forbidden.
According to Dr. Pallan Ichaporia,in his writeup "Vegeterianism in Zoroastrian Teachings", "edict against beef eating from High Priest Atrupat-e Emetan in Denkard Book VI written in the 9 century circa. .......

"ku.san enez a-on ku urwar xwarishn bawed shmah mardoman ku derziwishn bawed, ud az tan i gospand pahrezed, ce amar was, eg Ohrmaz i xwaday hay.yarih i gospand ray urwar was dad."
"They hold this also: Be plant eaters (urwar xwarishn) (ie vegetarian), O you, men , so that you may live long. Keep away from the body of cattle (tan i gospand), and deeply reckon that Ohrmazd, the Lord has created plants in great number for helping cattle (and men)." "
 For those who opine thoughtlessly that Asho Zarathushtra had recommended in the Gathas to eat meat; read before spouting garbage.
“O ye men! You partake of a vegetarian diet so that you may have a long life.-"Din-kard"
- Dinkard Book VI Prof. S. Shaked, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, 1979.”"

Further Reading-Eduljee (Heritage Institute)

Saturday, April 17, 2010

The Relevance of the Vandidad to the Zoroastrian scriptures

Scholarship of the last century, using the meager resources salvaged by Parsis and Iranian Zarathushtis, had attempted to translate the ancient scriptures, only to be caught in a web of European bias[1] and  Christian pre conceptions[2]. Conjectural meanings based on these pre conceptions were arbitrarily built into Gathic verses and Avesta scriptures, resulting in historical traditions of the Avesta being disparagingly referred to as barbaric sacrificial liturgy. Facts ended up as poor relations to fantasies; whether in dating of the times and  geographic location of Zarathushtra; the archeological sites in Balkh-Margush-Khorasan, or the translations of the scriptures; through efforts that can only be defined in statistical terminology of  “forcing data to fit the predetermined curve” of a narrative not based on documented fact.


Since the times of Kanga, Jeevanji Modi, Macdonnel, Monier Williams and Taraporewalla, very little effort has gone into original translation and  Philology; with most translators of our scriptures not being conversant with the giant strides made in the language studies of the Avesta as well as its sister Arya dialect known as Rig Vedic Sanskrit
See: http://vyoman-wwwzblogcom.blogspot.com/2009/12/common-heritage-language-of-avesta.html

[1]  The Bible, arbitrarily  dating the earth at 4500BC  was a big mental block for Christian scholars faced with older chronologies.
Historical baggage in the form of the Christian Church arbitrarily choosing the contents of 4 gospels (which even between themselves, differ in content) while discarding the other 26; caused a predisposition towards a flawed theory that the message of Zarathushtra was similarly usurped and  contaminated with foreign ideas by his followers.
[2] Max Müller. A paid employee, who translated the Rigved in a demeaning style. The hidden secrets of his life.Copyright © 1999 - 2001 H.D. Swami Prakashanand Saraswati
  
The Vandidad is a code of Rituals composed in the Avesta language about 100-200 years after the Gathas were composed.
According to Dr Martin Haug ("The language of the Parsi scriptures")
The Gatha dialect is therefore, only one or two centuries older than the ordinary Avesta language, which was the standard language of the ancient Iranian empire.]

Due to various reasons it has become a sort of favorite whipping boy by segments of non Zarathushti scholars who have often managed to hoodwink the devotees in the West.


A common refrain goes as follows: 
According to Vandidad, death, disease, injury and so on are acts of Ahriman (Devil). The Vandidad also prescribes certain punishments for certain types of mis-deeds. Apparently and according to literal translations of such passages, some of those punishments are very harsh (such as lashing for so and so many times) which could certainly result in severe injuries (which is according to the same source is a work of Ahriman). Do we have a contradiction here? A righteous person punishing an unrighteous one for a misdeed but committing an evil act himself? I must be missing something here? Could somebody explain.

The problem here is 2-fold.
1. Incorrect Translations. 
Example:.The word “Muthrem” has been wrongly, mischievously and  maliciously translated by some translators as urine,  to show Hoama (the elixir to immortality) in poor light. 
However, according to Dr Stanley Insler [The Gathas of Zarathushtra, Dr Stanley Insler, 1975, P290-291]
 “Two things stand in the way of   interpreting this word as urine. The word means solid excrement and “Maresma” is the word for urine in the Avesta. “Therefore I attribute the word to the root “mu”, to be deluded, foolish, appearing as “mura”,  dumb; and  posit, therefore the meaning “Folly” for “muthra”.”


2. Incorrect interpretation.
Making literal translations without reference to the context. 
Example: Relegating Zarathushtra to pastoral times on the basis of translation of spiritual concepts as cows, horses and camels; while ignoring the context of the verse. Never mind that the technique of mantra composing, involving specific meter, specific sound vibration and  scientific observation has not yet been matched by modern science. These so called liberal arts scholars, lacking a grounding in science and logic, have no explanation how this "pastoral society" made astronomical observations of far flung planets like the Sirius twins that were reconfirmed by modern science barely a 100 years back.

Lets not forget the creation hymn which refers to matter being created through a primordial sound (Man-tra); with a burst of energy (heat and  light);    a reality only recently attested by science.
[Scientific Validation: Science magazine (March 8 2002, pg 1868-1873): E=mC2
Blasting liquid acetone with ultrasound, scientists Rusi Taleyarkhan and Richard T. Lahey Jr. forced acetone bubbles to absorb this sound energy, expand and  then burst, creating high temperatures (like those on the Sun’s surface), fusion of atoms (creation of matter) & emission of light.]

Recent archeological advances clearly validate that the Avestic society was well settled, lived in constructed buildings (not tents) with infrastructure including roads and drainage. 
See Dr.Mary Settegast's "When Zarathushtra Spoke" 

Modern science has thus confirmed the assertion in the Rig Vedas that their enemies lived in constructed houses and used metallic implements.


According to James Newton Powell[1] (University of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA).:
"Among the accomplishments of the grammarians can be reckoned a method for paraphrasing (Vedic) Sanskrit in a manner that is identical not only in essence but in form with current work in Artificial Intelligence.” 
“Modern metaphysicians are rediscovering the fantastic powers released through spoken words. By certain arrangements of words, such as in Mantras, a tremendous vibratory force could be set upon in the invisible mode, which profoundly affects physical and metaphysical substance in the body of man.”



[1] `Mandalas, the Dynamics of Vedic Symbolism'.
  

Whereas the Yasnas & Yashts, are hymns in praise of Mazda and/or his attributes, the Vandidad is a code of conduct; a ritualistic code so strict that historians believe it was composed at a time of great political adversity.
Initially they erroneously assumed its composition after the Islamic invasion.

Modern archaeological finds on the other hand confirm the Balkh-Margiana (dated to the same time as the Harappa civilization) complex to have been built hurriedly, clearly indicating the geo-political realities during the antique time scale of its Avestic composition.
This is very much in agreement with the documented victory of the Vedics in Hapta-Hendu (Sapta-Sindhu) 



See:





However, it should also be noted that the fulcrum of  objection to the Vandidad is centered on the use of the word “Charana” which has been wrongly translated by missionary translators (based on biblical sensibilities) as “whip”; the implication being punishments meted out for non conformance.  
These so called scholars seem to have ignored references to the Creator as  Vohu-Manah or Ocean of Love; one who rules through education, not instruction.
Whereas these Liberal Arts translators have taken the root as "char" meaning Car/chariot/ locomotion, and proceeded to extrapolate the meaning of this word as a tool of the same and therefore "whip", without a shred of proof reconciling the context

They ignored the term "Ana" [attached to "Char"] meaning breath or source of sustenance.
Translating "sustenance/food" for whip, an externally wielded tool defies all logic.

The fact remains that "charana" is a word by itself meaning,   "Acting, dealing, managing, (liturgical) performance, observance.. ......... ......behaviour, conduct of life, good or moral conduct,.... ......... ..... consuming, eating"
[M. Monier Williams, Sanskrit-English Dictionary]

 As such "charana" therefore means feeding the Cow with a morsel of fodder. Since the spiritual concept of the Universal Soul (Geush Urvan) is represented in the physical world as the self sacrificing Cow, in the Gathas, is it not logical that these "morsels of fodder" are in spiritual terms good deeds that must be performed to erase our bad deeds. After all carrying out good deeds continuously like a ritual, after retrospecting is self correction/purification/evolution to a higher spirituality; A primal theme of Zarathushti philosophy.
 I believe therefore (as Dr Irach Taraporewalla has averred), that Avesta language must be understood from the philology and cultural context, not through preconceived assumptions rooted in unsound or literal interpretations.

We see this spiritual concept reflected physically in the outer sacrifice of feeding the holy Atarsh 5 times a day. This ritual  guides the faithful (by its own example) to a requirement of an inner sacrifice of Aeshma (the negative emotions/attitudes/mentalities of: envy, greed, malice, anger, sloth, and ego) to the flame of cosmic consciousness, with Ghee (Gao: butter made from cow) being the highest form representing self sacrifice.
Thus each "Charana" represents an exercise in self sacrifice,  empowered by genuine remorse with a goal to correct previously committed wrongs. 
Continuous improvement or Fra-var-ane is the hallowed road of self improvement.

Literal Interpretations, especially with pre-conceived notions has no place in a religious philosophy whose foundation is based on Reality and Science (A-sha: See: http://vyoman-wwwzblogcom.blogspot.com/2008/10/asha-algorithm-of-universe.html


This "whipping" obsession was a Roman past-time which had obviously influenced the middle east areas that they historically ruled.
Little wonder then that translators inclined to fundamentalism and steeped in the torment and tribulations portrayed in sections of their own scriptures decided to force-fit this degenerate behaviour into the Zarathushti faith.
It is high time therefore for Parsis to stand up for our heritage instead of being defensive against attacks from followers of a violent and intolerant ideology that preaches mindless conformance blind submission.
We are the upholders of "Reasoning" [Mun-yush Maz-daa Por-vu-em: The  power to Reason is the first and foremost] as opposed to the Druj (evil) who insist on blind obedience and conformance under threat of violence.

In the Zarathushti faith, there is self inflicted consequence for ones own actions. (A-sha).
One reaps what they sow.
There is NO Punishment, harsh or otherwise as that is the path of Evil (Druj). Druj/Droha  is after all not a religion, but a totalitarian political philosophy.

In summation, there is no discrepancy between the Gathas, the Avesta and the Vandidad.
Ahura Mazda is the Great Wise Creator, who is a patient teacher (not a vengeful, punishing task master). He guides devotees to a life of continuous improvement through logic and life experiences.
His 1st Attribute or immortal principle of functioning is Vohu Manah (Love). These are represented as reins (cords)  that control everything in the universe.
He is "the wise teacher" who educates, not Instructs. There is no demand for obedience, conformance or submission against threats of punishments.
 Thus in the Zarathushti faith there are no "commandments"
The threats, hell-fires and tribulations prescribed in other philosophies is replaced with Advisories to guide the devotee; leaving the right to "choose" above compromise.

This is the Unique feature of the Mazda(Wisdom) Yasni (worshiping) faith and that is why our pledge of faith declares it as:
Maz-ish-tem: The GREATEST
Vah-ish-tem: The Most Profitable.
Sra-ish-tem: The Most Inspiring.


Sunday, March 14, 2010

The Ideal Blessing: Aahmai rash-chaa

Yasna. 68.10-11


Ye vo aapo van-guish yazaite          
                                        This wave of divine waters do I invoke for that victorious soul

Ahura-naish ahura-he    
                                        who follows the glorious path recommended by our Creator

Vahishta-byo Zao-thraa-byo              
        That greatest treasure of the divine waters of Wealth (Knowledge and Truth)


Sraeshtabyo Zao-thraa-byo            

         The  divine waters  that are the most inspirational

Dahmo Pairi Angar-ash-ta-byo Zao-thraa-byo    
         The divine waters that flow onto him and his home in Radiance and Luster 


Ahmai Ra-escha, Khware-naish-chaa        
           Onto us, Thy warm Light of Wisdom and the radiance of Pure and Positive Intentions



Ahmai Tan-vo (तन्वो ) Drava-tatem           
                                              Onto us, Mental and Physical well being

Ahmai Tan-vo Vazd-vare            

                                         Onto us, physical Endurance to face life’s storms

Ahmai tan-vo Vere-threm                       


             Onto us, Victory over physical imperfections and  negative tendencies


Ahmai Ish-teem, Pour-ush Khwaterem,              
                                       Onto us the desired satisfaction of inspired achievement

 Ahmai asnam-cheet frazanteem 
                                Onto us, always improving, progeny endowed with insight

Ahmai Dreg-am Drego-jitim                     
                                 Onto us, victory against deceivers and the forces of Darkness


Ahmai Vah-ish-tem                                           Onto us, the very Best

Ahoom (अहूम )                         Invoking the name of the Lord

Ashao-nem Rao-changem Vispo Khwaterem       

                for Alignment with TRUTH and Justice, through Light (Knowledge), enveloped in the warmth of Reason

Atha Jam-yaat yatha afriname                          May it always be so


.This term “Drigu, from which the word Druj, or the Vedic Druh/Drugh/Dhroga originates; occurs throughout the Gathas and Rigveda in the sense of “demonic deceiver”; who are devious,  pathologically evil minded,
devoid of conscience; who revel in death and destruction.

Ahoom is the Invocation in Avesta, equivalent to the vedic Aum (ॐ ), with an H ( ह) superimposed on the A 
 
















                       

Friday, March 5, 2010

How Parsis arrived in Bharat (India) & their fellow travellers

The Zarathushti Escape to safety in Bharat (India).

Few are aware that the 100,000 Zarathushti souls remaining are the descendants of one of the greatest and longest lasting empires known to mankind; an empire that extended from what is today western Pakistan to Eastern Turkey and included all CIS nations.
Once, a nation of teeming millions who referred to their land as "IRAN(IR= heavenly land; and AN= breath) which literally means, in Avestic, the land whose air itself would make one spiritually pure. A nation aligned to a philosophy of Truth, Justice and Equality of all mankind. 
A nation that prized the characteristics of courtesy, humility, courage, gentleness, purity, compassion, protection of the weak, liberality, selflessness, and receptiveness to knowledge; and addressed such individuals as "Arya". This term of Avestic-Vedic origin; is derived from Ar= active-energetic and Yan/Yana = divinity.
This was the empire that produced Kurush the Great (known as Cyrus the Great by the Greeks) the emperor who codified the Zarathushti philosophy of equality of all mankind;

The unfortunate and violent demise of the Persian empire, in 642 AD, at the hands of an intolerant, conformist and blind submission demanding ideology, signaled an end to the era of free thought, expression  and an all-inclusiveness of unity amidst diversity, a characteristic Aryan way of life.

The military defeat of this empire called IRAN  the empire that had outlasted the Greek empire and at times, won over the Roman empire,  signaled a new degenerate type of warfare, where honor was substituted for deceit and magnanimity was substituted for cruelty.   No more were civilians off limits during the wars between kings; but were targeted with vigor and venom by an enemy intent on obliterating all evidence of their very existence. This Jihad, or elimination of anyone who does not submit continues today.


Jamsheed Choksy,  in his book: Conflict and Cooperation-Columbia University Press, 1997; demolishes the politically appropriate LIE promoted by IRI (Islamic Republic of Iran) and the motley crew of their cohorts, that islam was accepted wholeheartedly and peacefully. He documents that population records indicate that after the Arab victory over the Persian empire  in the 7th  century, conversion to islam took place over the course of several centuries.

Richard Bulliet of Columbia University confirms that at the time the Abbasids (750 A.D), roughly a century after the fall of the Sasanian empire, only 8 percent of Iran‟s city dwellers were Moslem.  
Conversions through persecution, confiscation of property, kidnapping of females, enslaving family members and periodic massacres inverted the above figures with 80% of the iranian population by the end of the 10th  century, claiming to be moslem, and Zoroastrians relegated to rural areas.   
When, around 1850, Maneckji Limji Hataria was sent to access the terrible conditions of Zarathushtis in Iran, less than 7,000 could be enumerated.


 Details of this planned genocide stretching centuries (Early Islamic History-Prelude to the Arab Invasion of Iran-Shahr
 ) can be read at:
http://www.heritageinstitute.com/zoroastrianism/history/islamichistory1.htm


So effective was this genocide (See: http://www.historyofjihad.org/persia.htmlthat there is no recorded date of when a band of Parsis decided to flee to safety in India. It is simply assumed from secondary data that this escape by the skin of their teeth was sometime between the 8th and 9th century.
One should keep in mind that the fallen Persian empire extended from what is today Iraq to Afghanistan and included all of the CIS countries. The first Parsi group came from Sanjan, near modern Merv (Turkmenistan) and the rest followed from various corners of the empire.

The  KISSE-I-SANJAN compiled several centuries after the arrival of the Parsis, from the oral heritage of various groups of Zarathushtis who arrived and received shelter in Gujarat, India is the only surviving record of this.

Originally assumed to be the story of just the group that came from Sanjan in the neighbourhood of Merv (central Asia), recent research (KISSE-I-SANJAN  by Byramsha D. Nasikwala ; published by B.N. BHATHENA, 100, Nagdevi Street, Bombay, 3) indicates that the discrepancy in the dates and lack of supporting local documents indicate:
A) Multiple emigrations from multiple sites in the erstwhile Zarathushti Persian empire.
B) Shelter being given by Koli-Konkan based coastal kingdoms which historically did not document their activities. Interestingly the Konkani language (western coast of India, from Gujarat to Karnataka) was always oral and has only fairly recently been put to paper with a Marathi and/or Carnatic script. 


Note the term  भारत:"Bharat" (for India) of Vedic origin (Bha + Rath), which is Avestic for Ba + Rath or the Chariot of Divinity.
Cognate terms alluding to divinity are Ba-ga (in Goa) and Bagh-dad, (in Iraq).
The term "Rath" meaning chariot, is also cognate in the name  Zarathushtra.

The cosmopolitan nature of the Persian empire is supported by the documented arrival of Hindus and other minorities in the same time frame from Persian controlled lands (the Black Sea to Afghanistan).


 In the extracts quoted in the above book there is ample evidence to show that when, in 700 AD the refugee bands of Parsi immigrants landed in Kathiawad-Saurashtra in Gujarat, there was a substantial Persian presence in place including Parsi independent principalities and Colonies even after the fall of the Sassanian Empire.


“There was a good number of Zoroastrians inhabitants’ upto A. C. 1185 in Sindh in the City of Uchh situated on the River Indus, one of whom had been to Seistan and brought with him a copy of the Avesta-Pahlavi Vendidad which was copied about 1248 in Broach. We do not know what became of these Zoroastrian citizens of Uchh after 1185. But we learn from history that the city of Uchh and the surrounding country were invaded several times from A.C. 1205-1257 and that the people were plundered and tyrannized over. In A.C. 1223, the Zoroastrians of Uchh, leaving that city had come down to Gujarat. Thus the old Zoroastrian population of Sindh and Punjab came to an end."


"Hajaj, the Governor of Irak, sent his Commander Mohammad Imam-ud-Din Kasim in 712 to Sindh, in which the City of Uchh is situated, and conquered it. From this time, also Sindh was under the rule of the Mahomedan Caliphs. Nevertheless as we learn from the above account the Zoroastrians continued to live there."
 "Thus, we see, that there are evidences, historical and documentary, showing that the Zoroastrians, even after being deprived of their Empire, could and actually did live under the rule of Mahomedans for centuries in Irak, Fars, Adarbaijan, Tabristan, Kohat, Sogd, and Khwarezam; upto the beginning of the 16th century of the Christian era in Khorasan and Eastern Persia; and upto the 13th century in Sindh.


As per The Oriental Geography of Ebn Haukal, an Arabian Traveller of the Tenth Century; (and translated by Sir Ousley Kt. L.L.D., pp.146-147). 
The Country of Sind and part of Hind. "Some parts (of Hind and Sind) belong to Guebres (Persian 'Gebran'), and a greater portion of this country to (Persian "Kaferan') Kafars (Infidels) and Idolaters (Persian "Bot-Parastan"). 
The above extract clearly shows that some parts of Hind and Sind belonged to Guebres (Zoroastrians) in the Tenth century. It is therefore quite indisputable that in 1000 A. D., the Iranians had their independent States and Colonies in Hind and Sind, and that a good number of Zoroastrians lived in 1000 A. D. in some parts of Hind and Sind. 


 "In Ousley's Oriental Geography of Ebn Haukal (A. D. 902-906) it is stated that some part of Hind and Sind belonged to the Guebres. Elliot says "the word 'Guebre' meant a Non-Mussalman generally and a Zoroastrian particularly. "Another known writer Masudi (A. D. 916) states that in his time there were many Fire-Temples in Sind and India." (Misar-bin-Mohalhil, Elliot's History of India,, 1-97, Bom. Gaz., IX, part 11, 185).


Mr. Shapurji K. Hodiwala in his famous book "The Parsis of Ancient India"(page 33) writes:-
"We shall see hereafter that according to the Arab traveller Misar bin Mukhalihal there were Fire Temples in Cheul in A. D. 950 which date is given as A. D. 942 in Bom. Gaz. Part I, pp. 216-217."


"According to Cunningham's Ancient Geography, page 319, there was a Pahlav (Pahelvi-Parsi) King by name Krashna ruling over Elapur and Somnath in 720 A. D." ("Iranshah" Addenda pages 684 (a) to (c) by Mr. S. K. Hodiwala).
We observe from the above passage that even after the landing of the Parsis in 697 A. D., a Parsi King by name Krashna was ruling over Elapur and Somnath in 720 A. D." 

For reciters of the Farvardin Yasht, this name is a known Zarathushti personage who is invoked.

The above extract confirms quite clearly that there were settlements of the Zoroastrians in Hind and Sind. The existence of many Fire temples in India and Sind in 916 A. D. also proves that there were settlements of the Parsis in India, as the Parsi immigrants in this country could not be expected to build a large number of Fire-Temples in India and Sind between the dates of their landing (i.e., 697 A. D. and 916 A. D.) From the Parsi chronological records we find that till the year 916 A. D. we had established only one Fire-Temple named "Iranshah" (in 721 A. D.) while the other fire temples seem to have been built by them after the year 1765 A. D. I think we have been able to prove this much from the above extracts that there was a Zoroastrian population in Hind and Sind and that they had a large number of fire temples in this country prior to the landing date detailed in the Kisse-Sanjan.


  Mr. G.K. Nariman, a great Sanskrit and Avesta Scholar, in his 'Notes' on the "Parsis of Ancient India" at page xv writes "Since then I have looked into the cognate Bhavishya Purana and although portions of the present texts of Bhavishya Purana are palpable interpolations, the light it throws on the tribe or tribes, whose customs so forcibly remind us of our own, represents practices of a tolerable antiquity. It admits of little doubt that there were settlements in India of the Parsis before the conquest of Persia by Islam".


It may be noted that Bhavishya Puranas were not completed before the middle of the 7th Century and none of the Puranas before 400 A. D. and M r. G.K. Nariman has therefore very ably pointed out that even from the Hindu Shastras that there were Settlements of the Parsis in India before the Iranians were defeated by the Arabs. It is therefore quite evident that the Parsi emigrants from Iran when they landed in Gujarat and Kathiawad must have received  help and support from their co-religionists who had settled in several parts of Hind and Sindh during the Sassanian rule.


 It is therefore quite possible that following the advent of Islam in India, the large Parsi population of Sindh and Punjab, must have been decimated by attrition and the remaining who could save themselves, gradually shifted themselves to the relative safety of Gujarat and a good number of the present-day Parsis must certainly be the descendants of the old block settled in Sindh, Punjab, Kathiawad and other places in India such as the Konkan coast. This would also explain the resurgent population, in spite of documented extermination campaigns by the Drujic (pathologically evil, devoid of conscience entities akin to mayhem promoting diseases) forces of intolerance.


It may be interesting to note that the epitaph “Bava” applied to Parsis in India has roots in Punjab and not in Gujarat. The surname “Gagrat” has no meaning unless we take it to mean a person coming from Gagret district in Himachal Pradesh, Dhalla and Madon from Punjab, Mogul from Central Asia, and the surname “Mangusi” after which the Delhi Dharamshalla is named is the “Mangeshi”, in coastal Goa. 

The Persian work Dabistan-e Mazahib authored by Mohsin Fani in the middle of 17th century, refers to the presence of the people of Zarathushti and Jewish faiths in Kashmir in olden days. Not surprisingly we find there is a village in Kashmir by the name of "Bomai" celebrated for its natural flames emitting from the ground. 


 One only needs to drive along the coast from Gujarat to Goa, to come across towns named Vashi (near Mumbai), Raya, Perne, Bagaa in Goa), Mahad, Daji, Nipani etc. Avestic words/terms mentioned in our Gathas. 
Of-course everyone is aware that a vegetarian parsi is one who eats fish; something that only Saraswat Brahmans do,(see note below) indicating close relationship at some historical point in the Kashmir-Punjab area. 


 Punjabis  celebrate their new year in Spring, like us; and more uniquely celebrate marriage after midnight. Old Parsis are aware that till a few years back, orthodox Zarathushtis would have their marriage repeated in “Ushanin Geh”-----after midnight; and as per scriptures, the 1st Geh.


The Navroz is similarly an important celebration for Kashmiri Pandits . In Kashmir, Shias are surprisingly also known to be observing this feast.  The haft seen tradition is called "thal bharo" or 'filling the platter' with handful of rice, pen, ink-pot, flowers, milk, sugar, and the new Saptrishi calendar.  The practice of a member of the family taking the platter in his hands early in the morning and showing it to every member of the house is precisely what the Zoroastrians in Tajikistan and Iran have been doing.  


Emigration to India was not restricted only to Zarathushtis as the following indicate a cosmopolitan escape from the onslaught of the Druj.


1.     Bhargav Brahmins: Settled around Bharuch  (former Bhrugu-Kutch) and Surat. Descendants of Bhrigu Rishi Identified in the Vedas as a champion of the Ahuras/Asuras), came from Punjab. Genetically related to Uzbeks, and Ukrainians, they probably sailed down through the Indus river at some unknown date.
2. Saraswat Brahmins: Settled around coastal Konkan Ratnagiri and Karnataka. Came from Kashmir-Punjab (from the banks of the Saraswati river). Avoid meat but eat fish.
3.  Konkanasth Brahmins/Chitpavans: landed shipwrecked, off the Konkan coast in 700AD, around Chiplun (Konkan Maharashtra) in almost identical circumstances as the Parsis. Due to inability to converse with locals, recited Sanskrit Shlokas instead. Were accepted as long lost cousins by local brahmans. Like Parsis, had no titular religious head till centuries later. Rising to fame on basis of their legendary honesty, becoming accountants to the Maratha empire and kept a lighted fire in their house continuously. They worship the deity Parshu-ram , the son of Jamad-agni. Recently through genetic study they have located their origin to the shores of the Black Sea.

4.    Bhojak Brahmins: or Shrimali or Maga Brahmins: Settled around Kathiawar or Kutch (in Gujarat state). Descendants of Iranian Magi priests. They came from the land of Sakas or "Shakadvipa." History somewhat similar to Chitpavans.

5.  The Udaipur Royal clan:
"According to one account a large body of Persians landed in Western Indian early in 7th Century, and from one of their leaders whom Wilford believed to have been a son of Khosru Paarviz the family of Udaipur is said to have sprung" (see Bombay Gazetteer, XIII P.248).

History therefore records a significant number of exiles landed on the shores of Saurashtra around 700 AD, from Persia, in approximately the same time frame when we arrived in Diu. This indicates a significant Hindu (or Vedic influenced) population in Persia prior to the Islamic onslaught  Their presence, along with that of Zorastrians have been recorded by Moslem invaders themselves as Gabars and Kafirs.